 |
GetTextbooks.co.uk
Compare Prices & Save up to 90% |
|
|
|
| Login | Sign up | My Wish List |
 | | Engineering Mechanics: Statics and Dynamics (3rd Edition) by Anthony Bedford, Wallace T. Fowler ISBN-10: 9780130324733 ISBN-10: 0-13-032473-6 ISBN-13: 9780130324733 ISBN-13: 978-0-13-032473-3 Hardcover 2001-12-20 Prentice Hall Find Lowest Price |
Editorials | ||
Product Description This book presents the foundations and applications of statics by emphasizing the importance of visual analysis of topics—especially through the use of free body diagrams. It also promotes a problem-solving approach to solving examples through its strategy, solution, and discussion format. The authors further include design and computational examples that help integrate these ABET 2000 requirements. Features strong coverage of FBDs and free-body and kinetic diagrams. Chapter topics include: Vectors; Forces; Systems of Forces and Moments; Objects in Equilibrium; Structures In Equilibrium; Centroids and Centers of Mass; Moments of Inertia; Friction; Internal Forces and Moments; Virtual Work and Potential Energy; Motion of a Point; Force, Mass, and Acceleration; Energy Methods; Momentum Methods; Planar Kinematics of Rigid Bodies; Planar Dynamics of Rigid Bodies; Energy and Momentum in Rigid Body Dynamics; Three-Dimensional Kinematics and Dynamics of Rigid Bodies; Vibration. For professionals in mechanical, civil, aeronautical, or engineering mechanics fields. | ||
Reviews | ||
This book is good. One of the best books available on this subject in my opinion. I learned better from this book than I did from any of my teachers. Great examples, reasonable problems. Full color and great explanations of the concepts. And with the help of the available solutions manual, you might not even need to take the course to learn it. | ||
Seems okay, presentation was clear and logical Was able to understand the examples and the illistrations were clear. Material well covered | ||
Okay, but not great Not a bad text. It is well-written and clear, but lacks depth. Slightly oversimplified. There is not a sufficient variety of problems. I taught from this text and found that I had to supplement it with my own information. | ||